History of Forensic Toxicology || 1878 Vosburgh Poisoning Case Study

History of Forensic Toxicology || 1878 Vosburgh Poisoning Case Study

Toxicology can be defined as the branch of science which deals with the properties, lethal dose, effects, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and postmortem findings in cases of poisoning. Toxicology is also known as the study of the adverse effects of Xenobiotics.

The term “Xenobiotics” is derived from the Greek word “Xeno” which means ‘Foreign’ and “bios” meaning ‘life’.

Toxicology is a wide field and therefore, has several branches or types of toxicology. Those branches or types include Analytical Toxicology, Environmental Toxicology, Industrial Toxicology, Forensic Toxicology, Clinical Toxicology, Veterinary Toxicology, etc.

Forensic Toxicology is the branch of Forensic science in which a Forensic Toxicologist applies the knowledge in determining the medical evidence to establish the extent of poison used or involved in the death of a person. It is determined by examining different tissues of the body.

Common Terms in Forensic Toxicology

  • Poison:- Any substance whether liquid or gaseous is inhaled, ingested, or administered and causes substantial damage to any organ of the body, then that substance is termed as Poison.
  • Toxicity:- Toxicity refers to the degree/extent to which any substance causes damage to the body.
  • Dose:- It is the amount of substance/chemical entering the body. It is usually calculated as mg of substance/kg of the body (mg/kg).
  • Drug:- According to WHO Drug is any substance or product that is used or proposed to be used to modify or explore physiological systems or pathological states for the benefit of the recipient.
  • Toxicosis:- Toxicosis can be defined as any condition or disease caused by the administration of poison.
  • Toxicant:- Any substance which causes a harmful effect when it comes in contact with a living organism in high concentrations.
  • Toxin:- It is any toxicant that is produced within an organism or by an organism. For example:- Pyrethrins.

History of Forensic Toxicology

The history of Forensic Toxicology dates back to ancient times, however, most of the work has either been lost or not found. Although, it can be termed the oldest practical science due to the need of people to avoid dangerous and poisonous substances. In those times, poisoning was caused by either carelessness, lack of information, ignorance or deliberate activities.

The earliest published attempt to classify attempt dates back to 50 AD of Dioscorides, a greek employee in the Roman empire. Between the time of Galen (131-200 AD) and Paracelsus (1493-1541), a few advancements were made in the field of Toxicology and medicine.

However, it was the work of Paracelsus which laid the foundation of Toxicology. He was termed the Father of Toxicology for his contributions. He was a physician and an alchemist who set the basics for Pharmacology, Therapeutics, and toxicology. He investigated the dose and its response.

His famous statement stated that “All substances are poisons, there is none which is not a poison. Only the dose of the substance differentiates between poison and remedy“.

In another instance of history, an event occurred where King Mithridates used to examine poisons on the criminals and drink a cocktail of poison himself to prevent himself from being poisoned.

In the 18th century, another development was made by Ramazini. He published a book on the Diseases of workers in 1700 due to which he was recognized as the father of occupational medicine.

Other developments included the role of Soot in scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps in 1775 by Percival Pott which was overshadowed by the correlation of nasal cancer and snuff use in 1761 by Hill.

Until 1700, convictions were based on circumstantial evidence rather than the identification of the actual toxicant used. In 1781, Joseph Plenic stated that identification of the poison in the body’s organs is the only true sign of poisoning.

The 19th century saw an uplift in Forensic Toxicology as many developments followed. 1n 1814, Mathieu Orfila (1787-1853) published the first complete work on poisons and legal medicine titled “Traite Des Poisons”.  His contribution led to his recognition as the Father of Modern Toxicology.

Mathieu orfila (Father of modern toxicology)

In 1836, Marsh developed a test for the detection of Arsenic in tissues which was successfully tested and used to convict the criminal through legal proceedings by Mathieu Orfila in 1839.

With new developments in the instruments and tests for detecting poisons, toxicology was beneficial in the legal proceedings to bring light to justice and truth. In the modern era, the advancements have been widened which has made it even more valuable to the world.

Read also: Introduction to Criminal Profiling

Role of Forensic Toxicologist

A Forensic Toxicologist plays a vital role in establishing whether any poison or drug was the cause of death of a person. In ancient times, poisoning was considered a safe passage for criminals to commit a crime. However, recent developments and research have assured that poisoning will not go undetected and the guilty must be found.

Poisons are frequently used in suicide and homicides and in some cases one may take them accidentally. Forensic Toxicologist work on various samples of tissues and bodily fluids responsible to detect the drugs or poisons in the body. Forensic Pathologists or crime scene investigators send the various samples to the Forensic Toxicology lab for testing of samples.

Forensic Toxicology lab

The samples may be of any kind and a Forensic Toxicologist must have proper knowledge about different kinds of poisons so that they can be detected. They must have patience and skills to operate in high-pressure conditions because in a single day, a Forensic Toxicologist receives a lot of cases and there is a responsibility to test all those samples in the given period of time.

There are different tests and instruments available to detect and determine the dose of a poison, drug, or alcohol. Apart from being skillful, a Forensic Toxicologist must be healthy and strong as sometimes, he/she may have to be present in difficult conditions in front of decayed, foul, nasty kind of smells and may have to stand for a longer time which could be very distressing.

Above all, a Forensic Toxicologist must be confident as he/she is an expert witness of the case and may have to testify in the court in front of a magistrate and explain his testimony in the best possible and easy way that the court is able to understand his opinion regarding the case.

Case study of Forensic Toxicology

In 1878 May, Reverend George Vosburgh a young pastor in the city of Jersey was arrested on charges of poisoning of his wife named Harriet. He was alleged to have been giving her overdoses of tartar emetic.

In the winter, of 1877-78 their marriage was failing because Mr. Vosburgh was angry that his wife hadn’t given her any children. She had undergone two abortions without his consent and accepted a ring from a barperson and the quarrels between both of them started increasing.

Mrs. Vosburgh suddenly fell ill which made her brother James suspicious that Mr. Vosburgh might be serving her poison while attending to her needs on the bed. On the basis of the suspicion, James took samples of her sister’s servings given by Mr. Vosburgh and her urine and took them to Bellevue Medical college’s chemistry laboratory.

In the tests conducted Antimony was found in every sample. Due to these results, a trial was set before the jury. During the trial, the professor brought his apparatus and performed various tests in the courtroom. Doremus’s demonstration on the witness stand was novel and impressive and was featured in newspapers. For some time, it seemed to shake the jury and the public.

However, the defense attacked the prosecution and called them disputed experts by attacking the chain of custody and constructing alternating events for what had occurred. James also wasn’t able to prove where his samples came from. Also, Mrs. Vosburgh had recovered by sitting beside her husband during the trial and refusing to testify.

The jury found Reverand not guilty. After his acquittal, Vosburgh resumed his work and separated from his wife. After a few months, additional evidence was brought in front of the press which indicated that he used to treat his wife badly and attempted poisoning. After all this, public support for him faded away and he was forced to resign from his post.

Also Have a Look at:

4 thoughts on “History of Forensic Toxicology || 1878 Vosburgh Poisoning Case Study

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *